"Quarrel with clubs" Goya arises in the English Senate, the possibility that each senator to speak in the language of their community autonomous and it will install systems for simultaneous translation for
.
Let them do whatever they want, but they are wrong .
I know some will say it is "progressive" I'm going to say, although it depends on what each meant by progress.
I know some will say that attacked a English cultural diversity, but nothing is further from my intention, it would be like attacking the diversity of climates, the evidence is questionable
I know who you think will disregard their rights. Neither. Your rights are much safer with me than mine to who gets wild on the subject.
is a delay make in the Senate of Spain speak different languages \u200b\u200bwhen fortunately we have a common language for all (bilingual various communities and those who speak only Castilian) is a waste
to be installed simultaneous translation booths, with their translators , wired to each seat, headphones, etc. And resources to enable the records are in several languages, and even set up some other simultaneous translation system, somehow, that televised debates are understood by all citizens.
is an economic waste and a waste of communication because the translation will never be as accurate as the language direct.
Instead of agreeing to major issues of state: the Health, Education, the joint distribution of wealth, the final solution of the bleeding stop, modernization and independence of the judiciary, the progressive loss of the cultural level, etc. . ... Instead, we seek the approval of laws or regulations for everyone to speak the language of a few in the place that belongs to everyone, instead of using the common language is also official constitutionally. What a nonsense!
parliament speak at each community as they see fit seems reasonable, culturally rich and even envy (I wish I knew those languages), but in the state parliament logical thing is to speak the language of the State, like it or not like some people, the Castilian or English (and English is recognized by hundreds of millions of English speakers in the world that are not English speakers say OK?)
We are in hard times, not a matter of walking gait dividing but adding, to join with logic, to seek what makes us strong and not weakens us.
Some apply in this our common home of the "divide and conquer." This is done with the enemies, man! It takes a fool to do so in the very place where one lives-worth the simile of the residents, "so that the final end of the farm made a fox, the unpainted stairs, the portal without bulbs and commons at the mercy of anyone. Each
and its co-official language spoken at home, is it not more logical to speak the other language common to all in public areas?
Although I insist on what I said at first. They can do what they want! The only regrettable thing is that few politicians and more exalted, behind the vast majority of citizens who are neither for this nonsense or what matters most to them, wasted their time and effort, our money and our patience on sending meaning common to hell. Instead of
join, split ... must be annoyed!
.
I know some will say it is "progressive" I'm going to say, although it depends on what each meant by progress.
I know some will say that attacked a English cultural diversity, but nothing is further from my intention, it would be like attacking the diversity of climates, the evidence is questionable
I know who you think will disregard their rights. Neither. Your rights are much safer with me than mine to who gets wild on the subject.
is a delay make in the Senate of Spain speak different languages \u200b\u200bwhen fortunately we have a common language for all (bilingual various communities and those who speak only Castilian) is a waste
to be installed simultaneous translation booths, with their translators , wired to each seat, headphones, etc. And resources to enable the records are in several languages, and even set up some other simultaneous translation system, somehow, that televised debates are understood by all citizens.
is an economic waste and a waste of communication because the translation will never be as accurate as the language direct.
Instead of agreeing to major issues of state: the Health, Education, the joint distribution of wealth, the final solution of the bleeding stop, modernization and independence of the judiciary, the progressive loss of the cultural level, etc. . ... Instead, we seek the approval of laws or regulations for everyone to speak the language of a few in the place that belongs to everyone, instead of using the common language is also official constitutionally. What a nonsense!
parliament speak at each community as they see fit seems reasonable, culturally rich and even envy (I wish I knew those languages), but in the state parliament logical thing is to speak the language of the State, like it or not like some people, the Castilian or English (and English is recognized by hundreds of millions of English speakers in the world that are not English speakers say OK?)
We are in hard times, not a matter of walking gait dividing but adding, to join with logic, to seek what makes us strong and not weakens us.
Some apply in this our common home of the "divide and conquer." This is done with the enemies, man! It takes a fool to do so in the very place where one lives-worth the simile of the residents, "so that the final end of the farm made a fox, the unpainted stairs, the portal without bulbs and commons at the mercy of anyone. Each
and its co-official language spoken at home, is it not more logical to speak the other language common to all in public areas?
Although I insist on what I said at first. They can do what they want! The only regrettable thing is that few politicians and more exalted, behind the vast majority of citizens who are neither for this nonsense or what matters most to them, wasted their time and effort, our money and our patience on sending meaning common to hell. Instead of
join, split ... must be annoyed!
.
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment